Sunday, September 28th 2008
Tina Fey Is Back For More
Tina Fey once again put on a pair of rimless glasses to play the hockey mom from Alaska Sarah Palin on last night's SNL. This time, Amy Poehler played the blink-happy and glossy-lipped Katie Couric. I didn't realize how blinky Katie was during the Palin interview until Amy pointed it out last night. Seriously. Katie needs to bathe her eyeballs in Visine. And when is Amy going to play Cindy McCain already?! She can hide her baby bump with a medicine cabinet. I'm waaaitttting...
Above is the always amazing Tina Fey once again stealing the show. Although, that's not hard to do. The rest of SNL was....well.....I already blacked it out.
Oh and Bono IS the King of Ireland!
ShareThis
How is tits style eh? As soon as TL shows up, she runs and hides under a rock.
whoops - take it back
Submitted by speakit on September 28, 2008 - 6:26pm.
WTF? It looks like Siegfried and Roy are hanging out here.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Laughed so hard at that I got a stomach cramp.
~~ Heeere Kitty Kitty. Tell us your secret of the honking big icon if you please.
Tigerlilly gives sexual favors for fun. I love her rough tongue.
Submitted by Tigerlilly on September 29, 2008 - 10:29am.
So, what the fuck did I do to piss you whores off? Actually, I LURVES the red lipsticks, so there...;-P
========
It was your super huge avie that sparked a debate. There were whispers about you giving sexual favours for big avie.
maybe politics is the whos who of cocksucking, now that i think about it. ouch, my grey matter is hurting now. i'd better let it rest now.
So, what the fuck did I do to piss you whores off? Actually, I LURVES the red lipsticks, so there...;-P
**********************************
Sorry, Roger, you are tiger now...
you know who could be another hot slut of the day ??
remember the dude that insists that he gave barack a blow job in the back of the limousine while smoking crack..... (lmao!) well that guy like has his own website and is hell bent on having you know whos dick he has sucked.
it's like the whos who of cocksucking.
you gotta love that!
WTF? It looks like Siegfried and Roy are hanging out here.
Submitted by Sandbitch on September 28, 2008 - 7:20pm.
@tits - tigerlilly is back!!
************************************************
And I LOOK MAAAHVELOUS!...You know, it is better to look good than to feel good...
**********************************
Sorry, Roger, you are tiger now...
@tits - tigerlilly is back!!
3-2-1
Submitted by TITS on September 29, 2008 - 10:11am.
Sandbitch - wtf happened to your christina eyes tiger icon?
======
Whoops. I slipped up there.
@Speakit - I only jus got a myspace a/c. Twas debfrmhell who invited me :)
Submitted by TITS on September 28, 2008 - 8:11pm.
Oh and fuck politics, fuck it right in the ass.
_______________________________
Woot! I'm changing my name to Politics!
Sandbitch - wtf happened to your christina eyes tiger icon?
I thought we were buddies in crime.
sniff.
Oh and fuck politics, fuck it right in the ass.
~~ Heeere Kitty Kitty. Tell us your secret of the honking big icon if you please.
Submitted by Sandbitch on September 28, 2008 - 7:52pm.
Speakit, off topic, but have you got myspace? I just uploaded some "local" pics.
_____________________________________
Nope, sure don't. Awww man, am I missing juicy stuff?
John McCain needs to lock Palin up somewhere and stop her from talking; this interview is absolutely painful to watch, both as an American AND as a woman. If they win and he dies, this is what we're going to be left with? God bless America indeed.
**********************************************
Love me or hate me
It's still an obsession
Love me or hate me
That is the question
And if you love me then 'thank you'
And if you hate me then 'f--- you'
"Why don't you read more and post less? All I've asserted is that I'm not supporting Obonghit.
I did enjoy your sanctimonious little hissy fit. Your turdcutter must reek of cinnamon and clove."
- No, all you have "inserted" is your foot in your keyboard.
Just because you hide behind the very transparent "conservative economics" doesn't mean we are blind.
You can claim being "liberal" in some areas but HAVING READ what you have been posting ALL DAY HERE, that you support, as in are agreeing with, promoting, etc..., is the GOP agenda.
The token "all politicians are assclowns" doesn't diminish the context of your disdain and condescension toward others who are not agreeing with you. Why don't you re-read your posts?
But of course, consider my "hissy fit" as trite.
I don't really care, as long as I am not lumped with individuals like you, I am as right as rain.
...I am aka BRADIFUL BITCH, I SWEAR!!!...
You know, I totally thought Tina Fey was going off the deep end when mocking that interview until I saw a clip of the real thing. All I have is one word: WOW. Here it is...
http://video.google.com/videosearch?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4G...
**********************************************
Love me or hate me
It's still an obsession
Love me or hate me
That is the question
And if you love me then 'thank you'
And if you hate me then 'f--- you'
Speakit, off topic, but have you got myspace? I just uploaded some "local" pics.
@speakit.
OMG PLEASE NO. He does not write the songs that make Speakit sing. How's about someone attractive? M or F, doesn't matter. As long as they look good, they won't have to answer questions!
*hands Star Jonez a pineapple*
=============
My friend had to literally BEG me to go with her. "you'll enjoy it when you get there.." she says. She works for a radio station and got free tickets. What! they couldn't even give them away and she expects me to go? Anyways, we hit the irish pub afterwards - that was cool.
*takes my pineapple and Krispy Kreme before leaving*
And Speakit, I propose the Jolie Pitt child army for your new VP. Combined, they're the appropriate age, and have just as much foreign policy experience as Palin.
"Submitted by aquarius on September 28, 2008 - 6:40pm.
Submitted by Fandango on September 28, 2008 - 7:36pm
I say telling a stranger to get off their fat ass and get a job, calling them stupid, etc. is spewing bile, but what do I know? I certainly wouldn't deign to assume why you're so angry.
*slaps Star Jonez back* Here, want a Krispy Kreme?"
I'm not angry, just convinced of the superiority of my beliefs and condescendingly incredulous toward anybody who thinks otherwise. :D
We skipped a light fandangoooooooo,
Turned cartwheels 'cross the floor.
I was feeling kind of seasick,
cuz there was bile spewage all over the thread and some bulllllssshhhhhiiiiiiiitttt
"Submitted by Star Jonez on September 28, 2008 - 6:31pm.
The perspective of even seeing it as punishment is a choice. Perhaps what you're paying is the full, normal tax rate. Why should those who struggle to keep up with bills and the basics of life not get a discount to help stabilize themselves?"
Did you actually just say my opinion is a choice? Let's not get totally fukken gay here, mmkay? Jeez... ;)
And in my humble opinion, when I see somebody who is "struggling" yet they have a satellite dish, a laptop, an expensive cell phone etc....I don't feel much sympathy.
And people with kids do get a tax break. Just for 2 though so tell those trailer and ghetto types that if they have 6 or 8 kids, they don't get a tax break for all of them! Just saying!
[quote]I say that partially from a moral perspective, but more from a business perspective. At this stage of my company I can only afford to pay $10/hour to the freelancers who help me. It's not much, but last year I could only afford 1 worker - me. Next year, I anticipate being able to increase what I pay slightly, and bring on another person. If I, as the owner of an unprofitable (I break even) company, were responsible for taxes at the same level as a major corporation, I'd probably never grow to a major corporation. I may never do that, but I'll get a lot closer by not being taxed through the nose as I'm trying to grow.[/quote]
how would you feel if the federal government forced you to pay $18 an hour to a worker?
"If you have a nation of people where the largest portion can't afford to keep up with the costs of housing, education (to get a better job), and basics like food and clothing, who do you expect to sustain those at the top? If a tax discount gives those people a bit more help, what's unfair?"
The largest portion can keep up with the cost of housing, if there isn't a bubble and they don't take bad loans.
And if you can really point to a household that can't get food, well, I want to see those morons.
"Grocery stores sell more food, stores sell more clothes, and you have a middle class that can afford to continue supporting the products that the upper class owns, produces, invests in and sells. Henry Ford did quite well by making sure his workers could afford the product he was making. It didn't break him, it made him one of the richest men of his time."
That was a specific point in history. I do admire starbucks in that they offer health insurance to even part timers. That's great. companies should be socialist in that way, but NOT the government.
"If lowering takes for certain people ensures they can continue to support the economy, local schools, law enforcement, etc. do you believe that doesn't help the country grow as a whole?"
Lower taxes for me is on principle. I support smaller government, period. If some social services get cut, so be it.
Good night all, I'm going to coco- cococa-bed!
Submitted by Fandango on September 28, 2008 - 7:36pm
I say telling a stranger to get off their fat ass and get a job, calling them stupid, etc. is spewing bile, but what do I know? I certainly wouldn't deign to assume why you're so angry.
*slaps Star Jonez back* Here, want a Krispy Kreme?
Submitted by Star Jonez on September 28, 2008 - 7:02pm.
Submitted by Sandbitch on September 28, 2008 - 5:59pm.
Submitted by parissucksliterally on September 29, 2008 - 7:33am.
________________________
It's my fault, I started singing and asking for free fruit.
I propose Manilow as Speakit's VP. Speakit/Manilow 08 (there will be free fruit, right?)
___________________________________________
OMG PLEASE NO. He does not write the songs that make Speakit sing. How's about someone attractive? M or F, doesn't matter. As long as they look good, they won't have to answer questions!
*hands Star Jonez a pineapple*
No bile, just an opinion, dude.
The war won't go on forever and it seems you'd just take the money we're spending on the war and chuck it at failing public schools and other silly things. I don't think you are grasping the fact that the bigger the government, the more corruption and the more waste.
We don't need a government with a several trillion dollar budget to keep the roads safe.
However, I do value national security so money spent securing our interests around the globe are usually dollars well spent.
I favor cutting most of our aid to foreign countries, getting rid of the FCC and the IRS, implementing a small flat tax supported by comsumption and luxury taxes, and scrapping all public school taxes.
But I've actually thought about these issues.
Submitted by Fandango on September 28, 2008 - 6:48pm.
It still doesn't make it fair to punish them because they are successfully raking in dough.
But I'm willing to listen. What's fair about it?
________________________________
The perspective of even seeing it as punishment is a choice. Perhaps what you're paying is the full, normal tax rate. Why should those who struggle to keep up with bills and the basics of life not get a discount to help stabilize themselves?
I say that partially from a moral perspective, but more from a business perspective. At this stage of my company I can only afford to pay $10/hour to the freelancers who help me. It's not much, but last year I could only afford 1 worker - me. Next year, I anticipate being able to increase what I pay slightly, and bring on another person. If I, as the owner of an unprofitable (I break even) company, were responsible for taxes at the same level as a major corporation, I'd probably never grow to a major corporation. I may never do that, but I'll get a lot closer by not being taxed through the nose as I'm trying to grow.
If you have a nation of people where the largest portion can't afford to keep up with the costs of housing, education (to get a better job), and basics like food and clothing, who do you expect to sustain those at the top? If a tax discount gives those people a bit more help, what's unfair?
Grocery stores sell more food, stores sell more clothes, and you have a middle class that can afford to continue supporting the products that the upper class owns, produces, invests in and sells. Henry Ford did quite well by making sure his workers could afford the product he was making. It didn't break him, it made him one of the richest men of his time.
If lowering takes for certain people ensures they can continue to support the economy, local schools, law enforcement, etc. do you believe that doesn't help the country grow as a whole?
Submitted by paris herpes on September 28, 2008 - 7:26pm.
Well said! Didn't mean to hit a nerve, I agree with you.
*slaps aquarius' size 28 ass* I think your mom jeans are kinda hot ;)
Fandango and most of aquarius, I rather pay those taxes then have our government currently function the way it has been, all the tax money goes to the war in Iraq and not much else. Social programs, education and the prospect of universal health care have been so severely cut out of our system that now we're paying for this deficit of services hardcore now with nowhere to go but suffer so that rich people can have even more that everybody else (because of those tax cuts). I thought this was supposed to be an equalized society but it NEVER has been, that was mere utopian thinking by our founding fathers. I don't expect to be able to buy a bunch of Gucci dresses and 300 pairs of shoes either, but at least have some of the same social services and options that other countries have for their citizens. Instead we have a social system that barely works and puts more people out into the cold because they can't afford to PAY for EVERY SINGLE SERVICE that in the end should be entitled to us if the government REALLY CARES about its own citizens. I mean honestly, we should be ashamed of ourselves if we don't expect more from this supposed "great country" of ours. Sorry you guys hit a nerve! Sometimes I wish I could move outta here and go somewhere that actually cares about my health and well-being.
Your face!
Submitted by Sandbitch on September 28, 2008 - 5:59pm.
Submitted by parissucksliterally on September 29, 2008 - 7:33am.
________________________
It's my fault, I started singing and asking for free fruit.
I propose Manilow as Speakit's VP. Speakit/Manilow 08 (there will be free fruit, right?)
Submitted by Fandango on September 28, 2008 - 6:53pm.
Boy, I can't argue with that logic... *hoists up size-28 mom jeans*... you sure told me! Let me know when you come up with any facts or figures to back the bile you're spewing.
"Submitted by aquarius on September 28, 2008 - 5:51pm.
Submitted by Fandango on September 28, 2008 - 6:43pm.
Yes, I do. Do you?
The government needs a certain amount of money in order to function properly. It is currently SEVERELY underfunded, which is why the war in Iraq is being added to our national debt instead of being paid for by taxpayer funds. The point was, if EVERYONE -- particularly the wealthy -- gets a tax cut, the government is going to have less money than it does now. It is not functioning well at the moment (see: the economy, infrastructure, educational systems, et. al.) and stripping the government of even more money via tax cuts (which worked SO WELL for Bush during the last 8 years) is not going to fix things!
If you are cool driving over bridges that need to be rebuilt or repaired and sending your kids to schools that can't afford textbooks or toilet paper, then yeah, I'm sure you don't want to pay more taxes. I, personally, can't afford to build all the roads, bridges, and schools myself, but I still need to use them ... which is just one of the many reasons why we pay taxes."
Higher taxes = more waste. Or did you miss that memo?
You're a big government dupe.
Submitted by aquarius on September 28, 2008 - 3:46pm.
Another point: Obama, McCain, Palin, and Biden are all rich. The Obama/Biden ticket wants to raise taxes on the rich -- meaning they'll both be paying more taxes. The McCain/Palin ticket wants to cut its own taxes. Now, which ones are the whiny crybabies again? "Waaaahhh, my taxes went up 4 percent, I'm going to have to sell my 7th house!"
When you actually get off your fat ass and get a job, maybe you'll appreciate lower taxes. Go eat 29 more Krispy Kremes.
Submitted by Fandango on September 28, 2008 - 6:43pm.
Yes, I do. Do you?
The government needs a certain amount of money in order to function properly. It is currently SEVERELY underfunded, which is why the war in Iraq is being added to our national debt instead of being paid for by taxpayer funds. The point was, if EVERYONE -- particularly the wealthy -- gets a tax cut, the government is going to have less money than it does now. It is not functioning well at the moment (see: the economy, infrastructure, educational systems, et. al.) and stripping the government of even more money via tax cuts (which worked SO WELL for Bush during the last 8 years) is not going to fix things!
If you are cool driving over bridges that need to be rebuilt or repaired and sending your kids to schools that can't afford textbooks or toilet paper, then yeah, I'm sure you don't want to pay more taxes. I, personally, can't afford to build all the roads, bridges, and schools myself, but I still need to use them ... which is just one of the many reasons why we pay taxes.
Submitted by Star Jonez on September 28, 2008 - 3:31pm.
Submitted by Fandango on September 28, 2008 - 4:13pm.
___________________________
Here's the thing - most people who make over $250K/year aren't doing so by climbing the corporate ladder. It's from inheritances, investments, businesses they own, properties and a diverse set of sources that most middle class people don't have.
Within that diversity come a lot of breaks. I own a small corporation - small being me and a few freelancers. My company is given far more breaks than an individual would get. If you have a bad year, you don't get to carry losses over. If I have a bad quarter, my company (and thousands of others) does. I stopped investing in stocks a while back, but had I continued, those investments (and returns) are taxed at a different rate than personal income. Own a property and rent it out? Much lower tax rate.
My point is, people who are successful as you refer to it, are already well diversified so that an increase on their personal income really wouldn't affect their lifestyle or ability to make more money. I don't actually disagree with your point that it's not completely fair, but 45% to someone worth $3million is going to effect them far less than someone making $30K/year"
It still doesn't make it fair to punish them because they are successfully raking in dough.
But I'm willing to listen. What's fair about it?
"Submitted by LOVE ANDERSON on September 28, 2008 - 3:27pm.
Well now that the true colors of our special guest today have been exposed, I can now make a conclusion that:
1. This is the type of rhetoric and defensive behavior of some of the GOP that I have based my choice on, not McMaverick, some of his supporters "beliefs".
2. They are sneaky like that, all patriotic then BAM, the truth and motivations come to surface.
3. Malicious and presumptive ideologies like the ones displayed here today by one individual who is supporting the GOP this time around only goes to show, it takes little prejudice to believe in something, it takes real faith to see it through.
Good Luck Freak. You're going to need it.
...I am aka BRADIFUL BITCH, I SWEAR!!!..."
Why don't you read more and post less? All I've asserted is that I'm not supporting Obonghit.
I did enjoy your sanctimonious little hissy fit. Your turdcutter must reek of cinnamon and clove.
"Submitted by aquarius on September 28, 2008 - 4:23pm.
Submitted by Fandango on September 28, 2008 - 4:13pm
Do you not realize that a large part of the reason the economy is in the crapper is because Bush CUT taxes while we were in a war (which had NEVER been done in the entire history of the U.S.)? Everybody gets a tax cut, the missing money has to come from somewhere."
What do you mean "the missing money?"
What the hell does that even mean? Do you even understand the economy or even taxes for that matter?
Submitted by Anonymouse73 on September 29, 2008 - 8:28am.
He's not a millionaire but he's still in the tax bracket Obama is talking about:
"2007
Joseph R. and Jill T. Biden joint tax return
=================
Their declared income wouldn't include their taxpayer funded expense accounts. I wouldn't mind peeping those figures.
He's not a millionaire but he's still in the tax bracket Obama is talking about:
"2007
Joseph R. and Jill T. Biden joint tax return
Total income: $319,853 ($71,000 income from royalties from his book; $66,546 - Jill Biden's teaching job; $20,500 - Joe Biden's teaching job; $161,708 - Joe Biden's Senate salary)
AMT: $2,721
Deductions: $26,516 in state/local/real estate taxes; $38,712 home mortgage interest; $995 "Gifts to Charity"
Interest: $99 from various sources
(According to his financial disclosure form filed with the Senate, he also received a $112,500 book advance from Random House and he donated $1,025 in honoraria from TV personalities David Letterman and Bill Maher to charity)"
Source: http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/09/12/politics/horserace/entry4445194....
Submitted by No Words on September 28, 2008 - 6:21pm.
If he's not, it's on purpose... the average salary of a U.S. Senator was $165K per year in 2006. The VP makes more than $200K per year in salary alone. To not be paying more in taxes under Obama's plan, he'd have to have no investments and no other income -- which, for someone making $165K per year, is pretty rare.
Talk about stupid that asshole McCain thinks Spain is located in Latin America. That's to be expected from a fuckwad who's unaware of how many homes he owns but he's probably not too sure of the WhiteHose exact location either.
Submitted by aquarius on September 28, 2008 - 2:46pm.
--------------------------------------------
Uh, Biden is not rich...in fact, he is one of the only senators who is NOT a millionaire.
hahaha. I like when she got cornered and got all CUTESY. LMAO
<3-------------------------------<3
RIMADYL KILLS
Submitted by Sandbitch on September 28, 2008 - 1:39pm.
Just askin - where did Palin's money come from?
--------------------
I've seen this question more than a few times online, asking ppl to look closer at Palin's money. Many of these posts have been from Alaska. Someone knows something.
Understood that this probably can't be said directly if there's a problem revealing sources, but where would be a good place to start? Hmmm.
Submitted by parissucksliterally on September 29, 2008 - 7:33am.
Who is dragging Barry into this? I love Barry- I'll fuck someone up if they insult him!
===================
Bitches started singing!
Her name was lola, she was a showgirl
With yellow feathers in her hair and a dress cut down to there..
So, yeah, I've been to a BM concert. And also Meat Loaf. I actually caught Meats guitar pick. Testament to my years of playing goalkeeper in hockey.
Submitted by Sandbitch on September 28, 2008 - 1:56pm.
I have been to a Barry Manilow concert.
I shit you not.
-----------
Who is dragging Barry into this? I love Barry- I'll fuck someone up if they insult him!
************************************************
Like anyone would be, I am flattered by your fascination with me;
like any hot blooded woman, I have simply wanted an object to crave
- Alanis Moristte "Uninvited"
Submitted by yeahbuddy on September 28, 2008 - 5:09pm.
_____________________________________
I gleefully make fun of everyone equally or not at all.
But we can have a 'stupid' off for the sake of argument.
You answer first... Do you want to know what's in my uterus? If you answer yes, you win.
Again w. the name calling.
*eats some grapes*