Tina Fey Is Back For More

Wouldn't a JOE BIDEN skit be a lot funnier?

Um, the guy, who is ALSO running for VP, actually said after the stock market crash in 1929, Roosevelt went on TV to speak to the public!

THERE WAS NO TV IN PEOPLE'S LIVING ROOMS IN 1929 AND HOOVER WAS THE PRESIDENT!

But you don't see the asshole liberals make fun of THAT now do you LOL!

If McCain said that, he'd be called senile, etc.

How stupid CAN liberals get, anyway?

Free fruit for all!

Uh oh...does that make me a Socialist?!?!

Aquarius> VERY good point.

Submitted by aquarius on September 28, 2008 - 4:55pm.
Speakit 08!

_______________________

My slogan is Spread the Word, Not Your Legs.

I call it the IDON'TGIVEAFUKKABOUTANYONEBUTME movement. So far, I have a lot of support from Hollywood and I'm thinking about asking PP to be my running mate.

I have been to a Barry Manilow concert.

I shit you not.

The mosh pit was reserved for the elderly in wheelchairs and the like. When Barry broke into Cococabana.. some took their brakes off and danced.

Hey. I was given the ticket.

Speakit 08!

I have lots of taxes. I uses them to hang purty pikchers on my cork board.

I can solve this debate. I can solve all of the problems. Total anarchy and no sex. You can thank me later, if I don't kill you.

Submitted by aquarius on September 28, 2008 - 4:30pm.

Submitted by LOVE ANDERSON on September 28, 2008 - 4:27pm.

I love you, LOVE ANDERSON! I love you too, Anonymouse and Star Jonez. And Speakit. And TITS. I love you all! Let's have a tickle party.
______________________________
Will we be able to eat fruit from the Carmen Miranda hat? Yumm

Submitted by Anonymouse73 on September 28, 2008 - 4:22pm.
_____________________________
*sings* Coco - cococabanaaaa (can I have the orange on your hat if you're not going to eat it?)

Another point: Obama, McCain, Palin, and Biden are all rich. The Obama/Biden ticket wants to raise taxes on the rich -- meaning they'll both be paying more taxes. The McCain/Palin ticket wants to cut its own taxes. Now, which ones are the whiny crybabies again? "Waaaahhh, my taxes went up 4 percent, I'm going to have to sell my 7th house!"

Tina Fey is so cute as Palin I want to put her in my pocket. Her accent is sorta off, but she's still SO funny! The King of Ireland is BONO!!!! Hahahahahha!

Your face!

Baracknophobia - What people to the right have been suffering from for the past year.

Palintologist - Liberal reporter sent to dig up skeletons on Sarah Palin.

McCane - What John uses to visit his local McDonald's.

Submitted by Fandango on September 28, 2008 - 4:18pm.
________________
Nice way to twist words. I specifically said unless you're the sperm donor...

And that's a gray area. A rapist should not have a say in if the result of his crime gets to come to term as a child. Neither should a dad who molests his daughter. A boyfriend, husband who had consensual sex gets a more credit in my opinion, but there are still gray areas. I can see that devolving into a Middle East type of rule that would put women's lives in the hands of men and I'm not crazy about that.

As far as who decides it's life and not a zyogte - well, that would be science, but since we're seemingly trying to overturn that separation of church and state thing, I suppose pretty soon we'll have to consult God (as in the Jerry Falwell interpreted God who's anointed the GOP as his disciples, not the forgiving one who says to leave judging and stuff like that to him).

So you know, there's a huge difference in pro-choice and pro-abortion. I don't like seeing abortion used as birth control. But even more, I don't like the government telling someone what they can or cannot do with their body. I don't like anal sex either, but hey! no pregnancy risks there, and if that's what you want to do with your body, you should have the right.

Alien in da house.

Just askin - where did Palin's money come from?

speakit> Um. Yes?
:D

*tickles Aquarius*

Submitted by speakit on September 28, 2008 - 12:00pm.
Submitted by radio siren on September 28, 2008 - 3:51pm.
Submitted by speakit on September 28, 2008 - 11:46am.
I have a feather. Who wants a tickle? come on.. don't be shy.

^^^^^^^^
MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!

_______________________________

'Kay! But you can pull your pants back up, I wasn't gonna go there

^^^^^^^^
*Pouts, then lifts up shirt* How 'bout this?

________________________
Dlisted's a hellava drug.

"Paris is fucking lame. She's more offensive to me than anything. She's a total, raging, disgusting, rich, lazy party slut. I pray that my daughter will not turn out like her." - Dave Grohl

Submitted by Anonymouse73 on September 28, 2008 - 4:52pm.
*streaks through the thread w. a Carmen Miranda hat on*

LMAO!

I wish Tina and Amy would come back to SNL full time. They're probably its last hope.

Submitted by Fandango on September 28, 2008 - 4:13pm.
___________________________
Here's the thing - most people who make over $250K/year aren't doing so by climbing the corporate ladder. It's from inheritances, investments, businesses they own, properties and a diverse set of sources that most middle class people don't have.

Within that diversity come a lot of breaks. I own a small corporation - small being me and a few freelancers. My company is given far more breaks than an individual would get. If you have a bad year, you don't get to carry losses over. If I have a bad quarter, my company (and thousands of others) does. I stopped investing in stocks a while back, but had I continued, those investments (and returns) are taxed at a different rate than personal income. Own a property and rent it out? Much lower tax rate.

My point is, people who are successful as you refer to it, are already well diversified so that an increase on their personal income really wouldn't affect their lifestyle or ability to make more money. I don't actually disagree with your point that it's not completely fair, but 45% to someone worth $3million is going to effect them far less than someone making $30K/year

Submitted by LOVE ANDERSON on September 28, 2008 - 4:27pm.

I love you, LOVE ANDERSON! I love you too, Anonymouse and Star Jonez. And Speakit. And TITS. I love you all! Let's have a tickle party.

Just sticking my head in.

Reading...

Submitted by speakit on September 28, 2008 - 4:18pm.
___________________
shhh, don't tell anyone. I finally got those kids to stop poking my tummy

Well now that the true colors of our special guest today have been exposed, I can now make a conclusion that:
1. This is the type of rhetoric and defensive behavior of some of the GOP that I have based my choice on, not McMaverick, some of his supporters "beliefs".
2. They are sneaky like that, all patriotic then BAM, the truth and motivations come to surface.
3. Malicious and presumptive ideologies like the ones displayed here today by one individual who is supporting the GOP this time around only goes to show, it takes little prejudice to believe in something, it takes real faith to see it through.

Good Luck Freak. You're going to need it.

...I am aka BRADIFUL BITCH, I SWEAR!!!...

Submitted by Anonymouse73 on September 28, 2008 - 4:22pm.
*streaks through the thread w. a Carmen Miranda hat on*

____________________________

OMG I want that banana! It's only been on the hat, right?

Submitted by TITS on September 28, 2008 - 4:19pm.

I have bad ass breath. (no hypen, not a typo) Does that factor?

______________________________

Same thing happened to me after I had the bad ass for breakfast.

Submitted by Fandango on September 28, 2008 - 4:21pm.

Way to dodge the question! Truly Bush-esque in quality.

Submitted by Fandango on September 28, 2008 - 4:13pm

Do you not realize that a large part of the reason the economy is in the crapper is because Bush CUT taxes while we were in a war (which had NEVER been done in the entire history of the U.S.)? Everybody gets a tax cut, the missing money has to come from somewhere. Who do you think is paying the $12B a month for this war? If taxes are cut, we're just going to go into more debt for the war, which will further devalue the dollar and eventually turn us into a third-world nation.

Although I guess if nobody can get an abortion, there will be a lot more kids and grandkids to pay the bill... or work as slaves when the Chinese and Russians move in, either way.

And I don't know where you are getting your 45% figure, but Obama's tax increase is nothing near that -- and I don't have much of a problem with people earning $250K + per year paying more in taxes than I do. It seems that many successful people (Bill Gates, Warren Buffett) enjoy spreading their wealth around. I guess the greedy motherfuckers would disagree.

*streaks through the thread w. a Carmen Miranda hat on*

Coop don't need no ass stinkin feather!

http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=-sl4EtROmhg

~~ Heeere Kitty Kitty. Tell us your secret of the honking big icon if you please.

"Submitted by aquarius on September 28, 2008 - 3:16pm.
Submitted by Fandango on September 28, 2008 - 4:11pm.

You didn't answer the rape/incest scenario. Not as simple as "letting some loser blast off inside you without being on the pill." Happens more often than you think.

And just because you happen to think abortion is an "abomination" doesn't mean it should be illegal! I think teenagers having kids they can't afford to support is an abomination. Other people probably do too. Does that mean I get to outlaw it?

Pro-lifers should "have things their way" for a while? They DID! For the 200 years before Roe v. Wade was handed down! Do you know how many abortions there were back then? A lot!

I'm sorry you couldn't have been born back in the 19th century, where you belong."

I'm sorry you don't live in Sweden where they love white people and abort babies too keep the blood pure.

"Submitted by Anonymouse73 on September 28, 2008 - 3:17pm.
You seriously don't get it, do you? Not all abortions are a result of an "opps". Women get raped, women are the victim of incest. I frankly don't care if someone else thinks getting rid of some cells is murder. It's MY BODY. It doesn't affect these people in the slightest."

You can kill as many babies as you want. It's your conscience you have to live with. You can rationalize it all you want as something it's not. Whatever gets you through the day.

Submitted by speakit on September 28, 2008 - 2:12pm.

I don't need to pretend to be a bad ass at a blog. Know why? Cuz I just am bad ass. I had bad ass for breakfast. I breathe bad ass. I walk bad ass. I live bad ass. Are you picking up what I'm putting down? Talk to the ass cuz the hand said 'pass'.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I have bad ass breath. (no hypen, not a typo) Does that factor?

This may be the last day to wear shorts outside for a long time (unless you're one of 'those' men).

Will keep an eye out for feathers.

~~ Heeere Kitty Kitty. Tell us your secret of the honking big icon if you please.

Submitted by Star Jonez on September 28, 2008 - 4:16pm.
By the way, I'm ready to be tickled. Feather pleeeease!

____________________

*tickle tickle* OMG you giggle just like Elmo! How cute!

"Submitted by Star Jonez on September 28, 2008 - 3:12pm.
I'll be the liberal elitist militant pro-choicer here. Unless you're the sperm donor, why should you get to decide what a woman does with her body? I don't care if that woman is happily married and just doesn't want a child, who are you to tell her she has to have that child if she and her husband decide they don't have the means or will to support a child?

And there are all kinds of non-whore reasons for that. What if she was on the pill and she's one of the 5% who it doesn't work for? Maybe her husband's out of work and she's working part time at Walmart and wouldn't be able to afford a child without government assistance, and would prefer to wait until they have a more stable life. Or, what if it's one of your dreaded welfare queens? Still opposed if the woman making the decision is an immigrant working a $5/hour job?

So yeah, let's expand the government to legislate what women have to do with their bodies, and make sure to remove any government support for those children along the way. Brilliant"

Having a law the outlaws a certain medical procedure is not "expanding government."

Setting up state run clinics to perform abortions is "expanding government."

And to address your first point: well, who is anybody to tell anybody anything? Who are YOU to tell somebody they can't kill their toddlers? Those toddlers can't feed themselves. Why not just expand abortion to include infants and toddlers too? Why not have a law that says you can put a kid in a room and if the kid can't get out and feed him or herself and the kid dies, no problem?

Who decides when it's "life" and when it's merely a "biological process?"

women get to decide that? What about the sperm donor? He gets no say?

You seriously don't get it, do you? Not all abortions are a result of an "opps". Women get raped, women are the victim of incest. I frankly don't care if someone else thinks getting rid of some cells is murder. It's MY BODY. It doesn't affect these people in the slightest.

Not being able to defecate in the street is not even close to being forced to raise a child for the next 20+ years.

Frankly, I'm not going to sit here and waste my time trying to reason with someone who only resorts to name calling.

ANYway...I love the little finger guns in the video. *pew pew pew* hahahaha

By the way, I'm ready to be tickled. Feather pleeeease!

Submitted by Fandango on September 28, 2008 - 4:11pm.

You didn't answer the rape/incest scenario. Not as simple as "letting some loser blast off inside you without being on the pill." Happens more often than you think.

And just because you happen to think abortion is an "abomination" doesn't mean it should be illegal! I think teenagers having kids they can't afford to support is an abomination. Other people probably do too. Does that mean I get to outlaw it?

Pro-lifers should "have things their way" for a while? They DID! For the 200 years before Roe v. Wade was handed down! Do you know how many abortions there were back then? A lot!

I'm sorry you couldn't have been born back in the 19th century, where you belong.

"Submitted by Anonymouse73 on September 28, 2008 - 3:10pm.
If I make even a million a year, I'm not going to be eating Ramen noodles if I'm taxed 45%."

So what? What kind of stupid logic is that?

to a bum, even if you're making 18k a year and you get taxed 45% you're still not going to be eating out of dumpsters. See how stupid you sound?

Fair is fair. This is a capitalist economy we have. If you're successful, you shouldn't be hit with absurd taxes, sorry.

I don't need to pretend to be a bad ass at a blog. Know why? Cuz I just am bad ass. I had bad ass for breakfast. I breathe bad ass. I walk bad ass. I live bad ass. Are you picking up what I'm putting down? Talk to the ass cuz the hand said 'pass'. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

I'll be the liberal elitist militant pro-choicer here. Unless you're the sperm donor, why should you get to decide what a woman does with her body? I don't care if that woman is happily married and just doesn't want a child, who are you to tell her she has to have that child if she and her husband decide they don't have the means or will to support a child?

And there are all kinds of non-whore reasons for that. What if she was on the pill and she's one of the 5% who it doesn't work for? Maybe her husband's out of work and she's working part time at Walmart and wouldn't be able to afford a child without government assistance, and would prefer to wait until they have a more stable life. Or, what if it's one of your dreaded welfare queens? Still opposed if the woman making the decision is an immigrant working a $5/hour job?

So yeah, let's expand the government to legislate what women have to do with their bodies, and make sure to remove any government support for those children along the way. Brilliant

"Submitted by Anonymouse73 on September 28, 2008 - 3:05pm.
Wow, so it's ok for someone else to tell me what I can and cannot do w. my own body.
Is this Nazi Germany suddenly?
Here's a thought: people who don't want abortions shouldn't get them.
See how that works?"

You don't think you're ALREADY being told what you can and cannot do with your body?

Go try to take a shit in the middle of the street and see how much freedom you have. Go walk around naked and see how much freedom you have.

You're invoking Nazi Germany? Why not invoke you socialist utopias in Scandinavia where they performed forced abortions on the mentally ill and brown people?

You can do whatever you want with your body until it infringes on somebody else, right? Well, some people think that's a person in there when you get knocked up.

If you don't want an abortion, don't let some loser blast off inside you without being on the pill. Sounds simple I know but some people are morons.

If I make even a million a year, I'm not going to be eating Ramen noodles if I'm taxed 45%.
Where does this 45% figure come from, btw?
SOMEone has to be taxed. McCain is lying if he claims he's cutting taxes on everyone.
And I thought you were leaving?
Also, I find it really difficult to believe you've never voted Republican.

speak-it> Ew!! Feather spit! Ewww!

"Submitted by speakit on September 28, 2008 - 3:01pm.
Submitted by Fandango on September 28, 2008 - 3:50pm.

I'm out. I'll look back to read your meltdowns.

__________________________________________

Pussy."
I have a few more minutes to bitch at you pansies before I have to go. ;)

Wow, so it's ok for someone else to tell me what I can and cannot do w. my own body.
Is this Nazi Germany suddenly?
Here's a thought: people who don't want abortions shouldn't get them.
See how that works?

Submitted by Anonymouse73 on September 28, 2008 - 4:03pm.
Tickle me!!

_______________________

*gets new feather cuz TITS slobbered all over the last one*

BLOOP AND POOPITY POOP LA POOP!!!!

!!!BLOOP!!!

...I am aka BRADIFUL BITCH, I SWEAR!!!...

"Submitted by Anonymouse73 on September 28, 2008 - 3:00pm.
You're assuming successful people always "work their asses off" to get where they are."

No I'm not. I don't care how they got successful; they shouldn't be hit with a ton more taxes just because they're rich. If you got rich, would want to pay 45% taxes? I think not.

The class warfare peddlers seem to have a bunch of tards convinced that a pedesrian existence just isn't cool in America. Nope, everybody's got to have everything or you can't be happy. meanwhile, people who are really suffering in the world look at us and think we're the biggest whiny jerkoffs in human history, which we are.

The poorest American is FILTHY RICH compared to the poorest humans on earth.

If you want to get rich, make it happen.

Tickle me!!

Submitted by Fandango on September 28, 2008 - 3:50pm.
when you're lying with some drunk loser who is begging to stick it in with no rubber and not after a baby is growing in your fukken belly.

_____________________________________

So true. If that didn't happen, there wouldn't be Republicans. :(

belly? LMFAO

Submitted by Fandango on September 28, 2008 - 3:50pm.

I'm out. I'll look back to read your meltdowns.

__________________________________________

Pussy.

"Submitted by aquarius on September 28, 2008 - 2:52pm.
Also, it is quite easy for the President or Vice President to overturn Roe v. Wade. The 4 youngest and newest Supreme Court justices, including the Chief Justice, are all VERY conservative, and most have stated that they would like to overturn Roe v. Wade. McCain has said this as well. As soon as one of the older one dies and he appoints another conservative, it's gone. If McCain should kick it or pull a Reagan, Palin is likely to appoint someone who will make Scalia look like Ted Kennedy."

Those are a lot of "ifs" in your scenario.

And so the fukk what? People who are totally against abortion have had to live with abortion--which to them is straight up murder- going on all these years in their commnities. Maybe it's time they got things their way for awhile.

From my perspective Roe v. Wade is a legal abomination, the truest example of judicial activism. I don't what it's about. Libs don't care as long as the activism is going the way they want it to. If a conservative SCOTUS started legislating from the bench, we'd hear all kinds of wailing from the libs just like we hear from the right over Roe.

double fukken standard much?

We should not want judges legislating from the bench AT ALL, PERIOD, I don't care it's about. Liberals seem to feel real good about life tenuers jerkoffs making law. Talk about ignorant of political theory.

You're assuming successful people always "work their asses off" to get where they are.
I think you will find that most people who are "successful" have not gotten that way by being the most moral people...

You don't think the dude cleaning toilets for $6/hr works his ass off? Sometimes people are victims of circumstance and need a little help. I'm not going to turn my back on someone like that.

Hi, the government can and does make laws that infringe on how people are able to live their lives. Case in point: the amendment to the Constitution that some homophobes want to put in place that makes marriage only between a man and a woman. Case in point: legislation that people are trying to push through that allows birth control to be classifed as a form of abortion, ergo allowing dr's/pharmacists who are anti-choice
to refuse to do their jobs. There are so many examples. SO many.

Why are you so filled w. rage? That's what I would like to know.

Tuna> Well, honestly, I think that they chose to focus on the Republican candidates b/c there is just so much material right now. I don't mind if they want to do some satire on Obama, but I don't think there's much to satire at present.